RE: VSAM - IDCAMS Backup Puzzle

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: RE: VSAM - IDCAMS Backup Puzzle
From: David Stuart (David.Stuart@ventura.org)
Date: Wed Sep 02 2009 - 12:44:42 EDT


Hi Kevin, 

Density is a good point.  Hadn't thought about that.  Cat2 is full of Virtual Tape files, written/managed by Jeff Barnard's OptiTape product.  

Cat1 is regular COBOL VSAM files. 


Dave 







Dave Stuart
Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
County of Ventura, CA
805-662-6731
David.Stuart@ventura.org>>> "Kevin Corkery" <kcorkery@live.com> 9/2/2009 9:18 AM >>>
Hey Dave ...

Looks like a good argument for new tape drives.  Anyway, the density of the
data in the files in catalog 2 may be higher than those in catalog 1.  I
know that IDCAMS processes at the CI-level but it likely only writes a
variable length record that contains the data.  The denser the data in
packed into the control intervals the more data needs to be written to the
backup.  The less dense catalog could show more space allocated and occupied
but there could be less data in each CI.  This is a possible explaination
but given the ratio you're seeing I don't think it's necessarily the correct
explanation.  Do you have enough virtual tape space available?  It would
help remove the physical tape technology out of the picture. 

Kevin P. Corkery
Independent Consultant
Voorhees, NJ  08043


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU [mailto:owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU] On Behalf Of
David Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:37 AM
To: VSE Discussion List
Subject: RE: VSAM - IDCAMS Backup Puzzle

Hi Ed, 

If you're referring to VSAM Compression, we do not have any compressed VSAM
files. 

Good idea, though. 



Dave 






Dave Stuart
Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
County of Ventura, CA
805-662-6731
David.Stuart@ventura.org>>> "Edward M Martin" <EMartin@aultman.com> 9/2/2009
6:31 AM >>> Hello Dave and the list,

Please correct me if this is wrong, but I believe that if you have
compressed files on the VSAM catalog, that they are uncompressed going to
the BACKUP tape.  Then the 3480 will us hardware compression to place them
on the tape.

Could it be that you have lots of files compressed on CAT2 and none that are
compressed on CAT1?

Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-363-5050
ext 35050
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU [mailto:owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU] On Behalf Of
David Stuart
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 5:30 PM
To: VSE Discussion List
Subject: VSAM - IDCAMS Backup Puzzle

Afternoon, 

We have something going on with IDCAMS Backup that has us puzzled.  

We have two VSAM Catalogs involved: 

Cat1 - 5 volumes, @350 files, 44% free space, files are pretty evenly spread
across all 5 volumes (thank you, VSE Navigator!). 

Cat2 - 5 volumes, @135 files, 54% free space, files are on volumes 1 - 3.
Volumes 4 and 5 are empty.  

Cat1 - The IDCAMS Backup takes 7 - 9 cartridges. 

Cat2 - The backup averages 24 cartridges. 

All Disk volumes reside on a DS6800, and are defined as 3390-3.  Tape drives
are IBM 3480-B22 with IDRC active.  Ditto shows that the cartridges are
'compacted' with IDRC.  

The IDCAMS Backup JCL is defined the same for both catalogs: 

Backup (*) Blksz(65535) Buffers(8) Nocompact 

The Tape Datasets are defined the same way to Dynam/T with Density 08,
IDRC/compacted.  


We've tried changing various JCL settings for Cat2, but the backups still
come out the same:  Cat1 - 7 - 9 cartridges, Cat2 - @24 cartridges.  

Ideas? 

TIA,
Dave 







Dave Stuart
Prin. Info. Systems Support Analyst
County of Ventura, CA
805-662-6731
David.Stuart@ventura.org 


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Sep 02 2009 - 20:20:12 EDT