Subject: Re: DITSECUR
rbotsis@aol.com
Date: Tue Mar 02 2010 - 11:04:47 EST
Bob,
For what I want/need I don't have a problem with securing or not
securing specific files, VSAM or SEQUENTIAL. All I want to do is SECURE
ONLINE DITTO functions for specific users, specifically those that
UPDATE something. BIM-ALERT will secure any BATCH access.
-----Original Message-----
From: RJacobson@decare.com
To: VSE Discussion List <vse-l@Lehigh.EDU>
Sent: Tue, Mar 2, 2010 10:37 am
Subject: RE: DITSECUR
As part of a larger batch security project, I took a look at DITSECUR,
but
quickly rejected it when I discovered that it could not provide
selective
security based on file name. DITTO security seems to be built more
around
either allowing or denying access to DITTO functions, a security model
I do
not find very useful.
Bob Jacobson
(651) 994-5329
"Edward M Martin"
<EMartin@aultman.
com>
To
Sent by: "VSE Discussion List"
owner-vse-l@Lehig <vse-l@Lehigh.EDU>
h.EDU
cc
Subject
03/02/2010 09:32 RE: DITSECUR
Please respond to
vse-l@Lehigh.EDU
Hello Bob,
How do you always know what I am working on? I have question about
Ditto security and auditing.
If anyone does have info about Ditto Security and auditing, please let
us all know too.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-363-5050
ext 35050
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU [mailto:owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU] On Behalf
Of rbotsis@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 10:27 AM
To: VSE Discussion List
Subject: DITSECUR
All,
I was wondering if anyone has established DITTO security through the
use of the above. If so, I'd be obliged if you could send me yours
which, I assume, would include DITS macro specification/s.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Mar 19 2010 - 03:35:10 EST