RE: Choosing a CICS exit

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: RE: Choosing a CICS exit
From: Leo Langevin (leo_j_langevin@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 21 2011 - 05:15:16 EDT 


It depends where it trapped it. There are several transactions that TELNET01 will call as it does a RETURN, and one spot where it will not. If it needs to next do a screen write it will terminate with a TELW, and it will call itself to do that. TELR if it needs to do a read next and does a RETURN to cause that to happen, TELC if there is session control to happen next and does a RETURN for that, and nothing if the session really does terminate (no reason to pass control). I'm looking at the source code now, so I'm pretty certain about that.

Leo Langevin CSI International 
Leo.Langevin@CSI-International.com (Powered by Entréee) 
1-800-795-4914 (ext. 3020) (USA) 
052 565 6840 (Israel)
 > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:10:17 +0200
> From: martin@pi-sysprog.de
> To: vse-l@Lehigh.EDU
> Subject: Re: Choosing a CICS exit
> 
> Leo,
> 
> >> without a "TRANSID()" control added
> 
> That contradicts what David showed as CEDF trace output.
> 
> -- 
> Martin
> 
> Pi_cap_CPU - all you ever need around MWLC/SCRT/CMT in z/VSE 
> more at http://www.picapcpu.de

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Aug 31 2011 - 23:50:08 EDT