Subject: RE: DISP * after OFFLOAD
From: Andy Engels (aengels@imrf.org)
Date: Thu Nov 05 2009 - 12:02:21 EST
That's pretty much it. Although I couldn't understand what part EPIC (CSI) would play to I rechecked and it was a non-EPIC tape.
this is the command:
o save,lst,c00,,*,crdays>7
The response to the command:
F1 0001 1Q2AI OFFLOADING SAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED ON C00, JOURNAL LST
ENTRY $OFJ1345 CREATED (11/03/09 14:06:18),TOTAL ENTRIES=000000702
AND TOTAL TAPES=00001
Sample of the results.
F1 0001 1R46I LIST QUEUE P D C S PAGES CC FORM BU
F1 0001 1R46I PPMB006D 00389 6 * A 4 1 TO=(EJC) FROM=(ECHA)
F1 0001 1R46I PPMB006D 00382 6 * A 1 1 TO=(EJC) FROM=(ECHA)
F1 0001 1R46I MBMB907 00308 6 * A 12 1 TO=(TKC) FROM=(TCHA)
F1 0001 1R46I MBMB907 00298 6 * A 1 1 TO=(TKC) FROM=(TCHA)
F1 0001 1R46I MBMB907 00299 6 * A 1 1 TO=(TKC) FROM=(TCHA)
F1 0001 1R46I MBMB907 00300 6 * A 1 1 TO=(TKC) FROM=(TCHA)
F1 0001 1R46I BCMB055 02353 6 * A 2 1 TO=(EBR) FROM=(TRAI)
F1 0001 1R46I BCMB055 02343 6 * A 17 1 TO=(EBR) FROM=(TRAI)
F1 0001 1R46I GENERIC 05069 6 * A 3 1 TO=(KBV) FROM=(KVIV)
F1 0001 1R46I BCMB055 05603 6 * A 2 1 TO=(EBR) FROM=(ERAM)
I agree, probably time to open a log with IBM.
Thanks..........
--------------------------------------------
Andy Engels
IS Team Leader - Technical Services
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Oak Brook, IL
630-368-5346
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU [mailto:owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU] On Behalf Of Martin Trübner
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:32 AM
To: VSE Discussion List
Subject: RE: DISP * after OFFLOAD
Cathy, Andy,
let me rephrase what I got:
You are offloading a bunch of listings to an EPIC (CA-BIM?) controlled
tape. The bunch is identified by a single command. Some (or all) of the
listing get the "*" state and there is only the option of restarting
POWER to clear this.
I would identify if it is all - or some- or every except the last (and
so on) and get in touch with the supplier of EPIC. Handling of tapes for
POWER has been tricky (in my time). Only after this has been pursued I
would create a PMR.
Getting in touch with IBM for improving POWER is an option. POWER could
create some identification of what is active and show that in some of
the display versions (i.e. FULL=YES).
I recall a problem to identify the partition with a running job with
dynamics in 99 (lab work during a course with someone from
POWER-developement) and the next release had the partition, where the
job is active for jobs with DISP=*
--
Martin
Pi_cap_CPU - all you ever need around MWLC/SCRT/CMT in z/VSE
more at http://www.picapcpu.de
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Nov 22 2009 - 02:20:06 EST