Re: 2n2222 as replacement for MPS5179

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: 2n2222 as replacement for MPS5179
From: Michael C. Boatright (ko4wx@mindspring.com)
Date: Fri Feb 27 2004 - 21:24:44 EST


Rod,

Rod, are you sure it's Q2 and not Q3?  I'm assuming you're talking about 
the QRP-RF PCB ASSY (RF board).  On that board, Q2 is a 2N5109 and Q3 is a 
2N5179.  If memory serves, I popped the 2N5109 once...  You really don't 
want to replace the 2N5109 with a 2N2222 as Q2 runs hot as it is...

Assuming you're talking about replacing a MPS5179 with a 2N2222, from an 
"absolute maximum ratings" standpoint (see below), you should be just 
fine--the 2N2222 exceeds the MPS5179 ratings in the most critical 
parameters.  So it probably "won't blow."  Most importantly, the 2N2222 has 
a higher power dissipation (and if its a driver, the Index drives its 
drivers pretty hard).

However, the MPS5179 (2N5179) is significantly lower noise, and its Ft is a 
good 3 times higher. The minimum Ft of the 2N2222 is 250, according to the 
Philips datasheet.  Using "Good Engineering Practice" (or W1FB, which is, I 
guess pretty much the same thing), you want the Ft to be 5 times the 
operating frequency of the amplifier.  Q2/Q3 is the IF amplifer, running at 
the 50MHz IF, so you're right in there with that parameter, and the minimum 
DC gain (hFE) is actually higher in the 2N2222 (but of course, with a 
900MHz fT the 2N5179 is a much better VHF transistor).

The biggest consideration is the noise factor.  So what may happen is that 
you may actually raise the overall noise factor of the Index, which for the 
same bandwidth, will lower the minimum discernable signal--per EMRFD, MDS 
(dBm) = -174 dBm + NF(dB) + 10 log(B), where B is bandwidth in Hz.

So, it'll probably work (and sounds like it does), but if you want the same 
performance as before, I'd order another 5179 and put it in, since it is in 
the 50MHz IF.  Might be OK, might not.  YRMV.  An interesting exercise, 
however, would be to measure the MDS with the 2N2222 in place of the 
MPS5179.  Would be interesting to observe the actual effect.

72 de Mike, KO4WX

ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM RATINGS

MPS5179
VCBO (Collector-Base Voltage) - 20V
VCEO (Collector-Emitter Voltage) - 12V
IC (Collector Current - Continuous) - 50mA
PD (Total Device Dissipation) - 350mW

2N2222
VCBO (collector-base voltage open emitter) - 60V
VCEO (collector-emitter voltage open base) - 30V
IC (collector current (DC)) - 800mA
PD (total power dissipation) - 500mW

ELECTRICAL/SMALL SIGNAL CHARACTERISTICS

MPS5179
hFE (DC Current Gain IC = 3.0 mA, VCE = 1.0 V 25) - Min 250
fT (Current Gain - Bandwidth Product IC = 5.0 mA, VCE = 6.0 V, f = 100 MHz) 
- Min 900MHz; Max 2000 MHz
Ccb (Collector-Base Capacitance VCB = 10 V, IE = 0, f = 0.1 to 1.0 MHz) - 
Max 1.0 pF
NF (Noise Figure IC = 1.5 mA, VCE = 6.0 V, RS = 50§Ù, f = 200 MHz) - Min 5.0 dB

2N2222
hFE (DC current gain IC = 10 mA; VCE = 10 V) - Min 75
fT (transition frequency IC = 20 mA; VCE = 20 V; f = 100 MHz) - Min 250MHz
Cc (collector capacitance IE = ie = 0; VCB = 10 V; f = 1 MHz) - Max 8 pF
NF (noise figure IC = 200 mA; VCE = 5 V; RS = 2 kW; f = 1 kHz; B = 200 Hz 
2N2222A) - Max 4 dB




Michael C. Boatright


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Feb 29 2004 - 23:50:08 EST